|
||||||||||
|
Allah (One
God) By Abu Iman Abd ar-Rahman Robert Squires Some of the
biggest misconceptions that many non-Muslims have about Islam have to do with
the word "Allah". For various reasons, many people have come to
believe that Muslims worship a different God than Christians and Jews. This is
totally false, since "Allah" is simply the Arabic word for
"God" - and there is only One God. Let there be no doubt - Muslims
worship the God of Noah, Abraham, Moses, David and Jesus - peace be upon them
all. However, it is certainly true that Jews, Christians and Muslims all have
different concepts of Almighty God. For example, Muslims - like Jews - reject
the Christian beliefs of the Trinity and the Divine Incarnation. This, however,
doesn't mean that each of these three religions worships a different God -
because, as we have already said, there is only One True God. Judaism,
Christianity and Islam all claim to be "Abrahamic Faiths", and all of
them are also classified as "monotheistic". However, Islam teaches
that other religions have, in one way or another, distorted and nullified a
pure and proper belief in Almighty God by neglecting His true teachings and
mixing them with man-made ideas. First of all,
it is important to note that "Allah" is the same word that Arabic-speaking
Christians and Jews use for God. If you pick up an Arabic Bible, you will see
the word "Allah" being used where "God" is used in English.
This is because "Allah" is the only word in the Arabic language
equivalent to the English word "God" with a capital "G".
Additionally, the word "Allah" cannot be made plural or given gender
(i.e. masculine or feminine), which goes hand-in-hand with the Islamic concept
of God. Because of this, and also because the Qur'an, which is the holy scripture
of Muslims, was revealed in the Arabic language, some Muslims use the word
"Allah" for "God", even when they are speaking other
languages. This is not unique to the word "Allah", since many Muslims
tend to use Arabic words when discussing Islamic issues, regardless of the
language which they speak. This is because the universal teachings of Islam -
even though they have been translated in every major language - have been
preserved in the Arabic language. It is
interesting to note that the Aramaic word "El", which is the word for
God in the language that Jesus spoke, is certainly more similar in sound to the
word "Allah" than the English word "God". This also holds
true for the various Hebrew words for God, which are "El" and
"Elah", and the plural form "Elohim". The reason for these
similarities is that Aramaic, Hebrew and Arabic are all Semitic languages with
common origins. It should also be noted that in translating the Bible into
English, the Hebrew word "El" is translated variously as
"God", "god" and "angel"! This imprecise language
allows different translators, based on their preconceived notions, to translate
the word to fit their own views. The Arabic word "Allah" presents no
such difficulty or ambiguity, since it is only used for Almighty God alone. Additionally,
in English, the only difference between "god", meaning a false god,
and "God", meaning the One True God, is the capital "G". In
the Arabic alphabet, since it does not have capital letters, the word for God
(i.e. Allah) is formed by adding the equivalent to the English word
"the" (Al-) to the Arabic word for "god/God" (ilah). So the
Arabic word "Allah" literally it means "The God" - the
"Al-" in Arabic basically serving the same function as the capital "G"
in English. Due to the above mentioned facts, a more accurate translation of
the word "Allah" into English might be "The One -and-Only
God" or "The One True God". More
importantly, it should also be noted that the Arabic word "Allah"
contains a deep religious message due to its root meaning and origin. This is
because it stems from the Arabic verb ta'allaha (or alaha), which means
"to be worshipped". Thus in Arabic, the word "Allah" means
"The One who deserves all worship". This, in a nutshell, is the Pure
Monotheistic message of Islam. You see, according to Islam,
"monotheism" is much more than simply believing in the existence of
"only One God" - as seemingly opposed to two, three or more. If one
understands the root meaning of the word "Allah", this point should
become clear. One should understand that Islam's criticism of the other
religions that claim to be "monotheistic" is not because they are
"polytheistic" in the classic sense, but because they direct various
forms of worship to other than Almighty God. We will discuss the meaning of
worship in Islam below, however, before moving on it should be noted that many
non-Muslims are unaware of the distinction between simply believing in the
existence of only One God and reserving all worship for Him alone. Many
Christians are painfully unaware of this point, and thus you often find them
asking how Muslims can accuse the followers of Jesus, peace be upon him, of
being "polytheists" when they were all "monotheistic Jews".
First of all, it should be clarified that the word "polytheist"
doesn't really sound right in this context, since to many it implies simply
believing in the existence of more than one God. So in an Islamic context,
"associators", "man-worshippers" or "creature
worshippers" might be more accurate and appropriate terms - especially
since Christians believe Jesus to be both "100% God and 100% man",
while still paying lip-service to God's "Oneness". However, as we're
previously touched upon, what is really at the root of this problem is the fact
that Christians - as well as the members of other religions - don't really know
what "monotheism" means - especially in the Islamic sense. All of the
books, articles and papers that I've read which were written by Christians
invariably limit "monotheism" to believing in the existence of
"One Sovereign and Creator God". Islam, however, teaches much more
than this. Suffice it to
say that just because someone claims to be a "monotheistic" Jew,
Christian or Muslim, that doesn't keep them from falling into corrupt beliefs
and idolatrous practices. Many people, including some Muslims, claim belief in
"One God" even though they've fallen into acts of idolatry.
Certainly, many Protestants accuse Roman Catholics of idolatrous practices in
regards to the saints and the Virgin Mary. Likewise, the Greek Orthodox Church is
considered "idolatrous" by many other Christians because in much of
their worship they use icons. However, if you ask a Roman Catholic or a Greek
Orthodox person if God is "One", they will invariably answer:
"Yes!". This lip-service, however, does not stop them from being
"creature worshipping" idolaters. The same goes for Hindus, who just
consider their gods to be "manifestations" or
"incarnations" of the One Supreme God. Everyone should
be aware of the fact that throughout the long history of the "Abrahamic
Faiths", there have people who, while believing in "One God",
have adopted beliefs and practices that completely nullify their claim to
"monotheism". This is the Muslim view of Christians. We're well aware
of the fact that they claim belief in "One God" with their lips, but
this doesn't mean that they don't nullify their claim in other ways. This is
because many people simply haven't been taught everything that Pure Monotheism
entails. From an Islamic point of view, "monotheism" can be nullified
in many ways. For example, simply believing that it is permissible to rule by
Western "liberal" and "democratic" laws in lieu of the
Divinely Revealed Law of Almighty God makes one a "polytheist".
Certainly, a person who does such a thing, whether Jewish, Christian or Muslim,
doesn't ever believe that there is another Almighty Creator and Sovereign Lord.
However, for all practical purposes, such a person has take another
"god", whether they choose to admit it or not. In this way they are
associating partners with Almighty God (Arabic: shirk), and thus become a
"polytheist" in a practical sense, regardless of their lip-service to
"monotheism". This holds true even if the person doesn't believe what
they are doing is "worship". For example, Roman Catholics who pray to
the Virgin Mary will staunchly deny that they are "worshipping" her.
They instead call it "adoration" or some other watered-down term.
However, from an Islamic point of view, what is worship if not this? Islam
teaches that prayer and supplication are the marrow of worship, so if one
directs their prayers to an intermediary (even if the pray is
"ultimately" meant for God), then what is left of worship?
Additionally, how can someone who believes in Almighty God follow man-made laws
instead of God's Law, without admitting that they've begun worshipping other
than God? Do they know better than God? Additionally,
the Old Testament makes it perfectly clear that making a "graven
image" of any created thing (not to mention ones which are supposed to
"represent" Almighty God) is prohibited. Please see Exodus 20:4-6,
Leviticus 26:1 and Deuteronomy 4:16, 23, 25, 5:8 and Nehemiah 9:6 for some
statements in regards to this point. Without addressing the issue that
Christians commonly violate the unambiguous commandment not to even
"make" representations of anything that is in the "heavens above
or on the earth beneath", these verses not only teach that worshipping
idols is prohibited, but also that Almighty God is eternally distinct from His
creation and thus nothing in His creation can represent Him. To believe
otherwise is to be a de facto idol worshipper - even if one claims belief in
one, and only one, "True God". In Exodus 20:4-6 and Deuteronomy 4:16,
Almighty God - who is a "Jealous God" - makes it perfectly clear that
He is distinct from His creation. By giving such
clear and merciful guidance to human beings, God is establishing a universal
and eternal Truth for the benefit of mankind. This eternal Truth is the bedrock
of religious guidance, since once people begin to believe that Almighty God
mixes with or can be represented by His creation, they can be duped into
believing almost anything. Once someone accepts that God has become
"incarnate" in His creation, or that someone or something is a "manifestation"
- and thus representation - of Him, the floodgates are open and
"Truth" becomes a matter of subjective guesswork. Once the first and
most basic concept is violated - regardless of how complicated and
sophisticated the rationale for it might be - it is very easy to fall further
and further away from the Eternal Truth of Pure Monotheism. In the final
analysis, it is not a question of whether God is capable of becoming a man, but
rather a question of whether one bases their beliefs about God on clear,
unambiguous and authentic guidance. Once it is left up to the human mind to
decide what Almighty God can and cannot do, the stage is set for misguidance to
take root. Human speculation about God only ends up leading to misguidance and
despair, since no clear conclusions can ever be reached. For example, is God
capable of creating an object so heavy that He is incapable of moving it? If
not, does that mean that He is incapable? It is because of misguided questions
like this that Islam clearly teaches that mankind should only say about God
what He has said about Himself. This means all of our ideas about God must be
based on Revelation - not human speculation. In short, the final prophet of
Islam - Muhammad - was sent by Almighty God to preach the same Pure Monotheism
that was practiced by Noah, Abraham, Moses, David and Jesus - peace be upon
them all. This Pure Monotheism means not only believing that there is only One
God in existence, but realizing that He is transcedent above His creation and
that all worship is due to Him alone. Before
concluding, we should probably address the practice of those Muslims who insist
on using the Arabic word "Allah" even when speaking English. Even
though this practice certainly is not to be condemned when it is done around
those who understand the meaning of the Arabic word "Allah", it is my
experience - both during my years as a non-Muslim and my years as a Muslim -
that such a practice can (and usually does) breed misunderstanding. It seems
that often times, many of the Muslims who use the word "Allah" in
lieu of the word "God", even when trying to attract people to Islam,
are unaware of the severe misunderstandings that many non-Muslims have about
Islam (and the distorted way which Islam has been portrayed in the West).
Insisting on using the word "Allah" only fuels the flames of
misunderstanding - so there's no good reason to do it. I've often wondered what
value some Muslims think that using the word "Allah" adds to the Pure
Message that they are trying to convey. ( . . . and I'm still waiting for an
answer!) Unfortunately, those Muslims who insist on using the word
"Allah" even when addressing non-Muslims who are unfamiliar with
Islam and the Arabic language, do both a disservice to themselves and their
religion. Unfortunately, this practice is usually based on the false assumption
- by a non-native speaker of English - that the word "God" in English
is incapable of expressing a pure and proper belief in Almighty God. This is
certainly false. If someone says that the English word "God" cannot
be used to express the Pure Islamic Belief in Tawhid, they are wrong not
because they don't understand Tawhid, but simply because they don't understand
the English language. Many people who insist on using the Arabic word
"Allah" usually don't realize this, because in reality, they are not
so much affirming the word "Allah" as they are rejecting the word
"God" as unsuitable - based on incorrect assumptions. For someone to
assume that the word "God" presupposes a certain theological
point-of-view (such as the Trinity) is simply Wrong - and that's Wrong with a
capital "W". To say the word "God" should be rejected
because it can be changed into "god", "gods" or
"goddess" is illogical because each of these words has a distinctive
meaning and a distinctive spelling - at least to someone who knows how to speak
English correctly. Using the same logic, I can demonstrate that the root
letters "ktb" can be used to form the Arabic words "kitab"
(book), "maktabah" (library), "maktab" (office) and
"kaatib" (writer), but does that mean that these words have the same
meaning? Do Arabic-speaking people go through life confusing libraries with
writers and offices with books (both in conversation and in reality)? I think
not! This is not to mention the fact that if the Arabic "Al-" was put
in front of these words in order to make them definite, confusion would be even
less likely! So the logic in both cases is the same, and this is because even
though the same letters are used in "God" and "god", these
two words have two different meanings in the English language. The capital
"G" implies something different than the small "g" - and
anyone who denies this simply doesn't know how to speak the English language. In concluding
this point, it should be mentioned that Arabic-speaking Muslims who believe in
Pure Tawhid, Arabic-speaking Christians, the idol worshippers of Mecca and
(so-called) Muslims who believe in "Wahdat al-Wujud" all use the word
"Allah". However, does this guarantee all of them proper belief in
"Allah"? Certainly not, because if they have a corrupt concept of
"Allah" it doesn't matter what word they use! This brings us
to a more important point: It should be clearly understood that what Islam is
primarily concerned with is correcting mankind's concept of Almighty God. What
we are ultimately going to be held accountable at the end of our life is not
whether we prefer the word "Allah" over the word "God", but
what our concept of God is. Language is only a side issue. A person can have an
incorrect concept of God while using the word "Allah", and likewise a
person can have a correct concept of God while using the word "God".
This is because both of these words are equally capable of being misused and
being improperly defined. As we've already mentioned, using the word
"Allah" no more insinuates belief in the Unity of God than the use of
the word "God" insinuates belief in the Trinity - or any other
theological opinion. Naturally, when God sends a revelation to mankind through
a prophet, He is going to send it in a language that the people who receive it
can understand and relate to. Almighty God makes this clear in the Qur'an, when
He states: "Never did
We send a Messenger except (to teach) in the language of his (own) people in
order to make (things) clear to them." (Qur'an,
Chapter 14 - "Abraham", Verse 4) As Muslims, we
think that it is unfortunate that we have to go into details on such seemingly
minor issues, but so many falsehoods have been heaped upon our religion, that
we feel that it is our duty to try to break down the barriers of falsehood.
This isn't always easy, since there is a lot of anti-Islamic literature in
existence which tries to make Islam look like something strange and foreign to
Westerners. There are some people out there, who are obviously not on the side
of truth, that want to get people to believe that "Allah" is just
some Arabian "god", and that Islam is completely "other" -
meaning that it has no common roots with the other Abrahamic religions (i.e.
Christianity and Judaism). To say that Muslims worship a different
"God" because they say "Allah" is just as illogical as
saying that French people worship another God because they use the word
"Dieu", that Spanish-speaking people worship a different God because
they say "Dios" or that the Hebrews worshipped a different God
because they sometimes call Him "Yahweh". Certainly, reasoning like
this is quite ridiculous! It should also be mentioned, that claiming that any
one language uses the only the correct word for God is tantamount to denying
the universality of God's message to mankind, which was to all nations, tribes
and people through various prophets who spoke different languages. Before closing,
we would like everyone to be aware of the fact that some Christian missionary
organizations print English literature intended to teach Christians about Islam
which say such things as: "Allah is the god of the Muslims" and that
"Muhammad came to get people to believe in the god Allah" - implying
that "Allah" is some sort of false "god". However, when
these same organizations print literature in the Arabic language, hoping to
lead Arabic-speaking Muslims "to Christ", they use the word
"Allah" for God. It seems that if they were on the side of truth,
they would not have to resort to such inconsistencies. And on an even more
ridiculous note . . . there are also missionary organizations that exceed this
in ignorance (or deceit) by writing books that call on Muslims to give up their
belief in "Allah", and instead worship the "Lord" Jesus,
"the Son of God". Besides making it abundantly clear that they are
outside the community of Pure Monotheism, the people who write such material
don't even realize that if they wrote such a pamphlet in Arabic, it would be
self-contradictory. This is because in an Arabic Bible Jesus is the "Son
of Allah"! If an Arabic-speaking person gave up the worship of
"Allah", they would have no God to worship, since "Allah"
is simply the Arabic word for God! Before we conclude, however, we would like to ask our readers to ask themselves what they think the reasons are behind all of these lies? If Islam was just some false religion that didn't make any sense, would so many people, from Western scholars to Christian missionaries, have to tell so many lies about it? The reason is that the Ultimate Truth of Islam stands on solid ground and its unshakable belief in the Unity of God is above reproach. Due to this, Christians can't criticize its doctrines directly, but instead make up things about Islam that aren't true so that people lose the desire to learn more. If Muslims were able to present Islam in the proper way to people in the West, it surely might make many people reconsider and re-evaluate their own beliefs. It is quite likely that Christians, when they find out that there is a universal religion in the world that teaches people to worship and love God, while also practicing Pure Monotheism, would at least feel that they should re-examine the basis for their own beliefs and doctrines. http://www.islamontheweb.com/Islamic%20Article/Allah.html |
Please report any
broken links to
Webmaster
Copyright © 1988-2012 irfi.org. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer