|
Islam & the West: Searching for Common Ground
By Ambassador Akbar Ahmed
Ibn
Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies
American University, Washington DC
On that
catastrophic day of September 11, 2001, I was acutely aware that the sole
super-power of the world, the United States, which had the capacity to show the
way to solving the global challenges that faced us, could be diverted in an
endless war of revenge and anger. This event set the United States directly in
confrontation with the world of Islam as it launched its “war on terror”. The
complicated confrontation is bleeding the energies and resources of both
civilizations. It is diverting the US from its greater mission of showing the
way to solve the problems that face the planet and concerns every human on
earth. Whether the US accepts the role as the moral leader for the twenty-first
century willingly or not, the US is the sole super-power and leader.
Let us remind
ourselves why a dialogue between the US and the Muslim world is important. Islam
is a world civilization of 1.4 billion people, 57 states – one of which is
nuclear for the time-being – and there are seven million Muslims living in the
United States. Besides the United States has troops fighting and losing lives in
two Muslim nations – Iraq and Afghanistan. Neither the war on terror nor a
serious tackling of the global crises facing us can be resolved unless the vast
and highly significant world of Islam is brought into a mutually respectful
partnership with the rest of the world — especially the United States.
As a Muslim
scholar living in Washington, DC, I felt I had to do whatever little I could to
create understanding between the two. I also knew that my extensive field
experiences in charge of some of the most inaccessible areas of the Muslim world
– such as South Waziristan Agency where Osama bin Laden is supposed to be hiding
– would be an added advantage for both sides. This urge took me on travels in
the Muslim world to nine countries in the three major regions of the Muslim
world – the Middle East, South Asia and Far East Asia from February to April,
2006. I was accompanied by a small but enthusiastic group of American research
assistants. We were able to discuss these issues with a whole range of people
from President Musharraf to prime ministers, princes, sheikhs, professors, and
students. We visited mosques, madrassahs, university campuses and classrooms.
The project was sponsored by three leading institutions in Washington DC –
American University, the Brookings Institution, and the Pew Forum.
BAD NEWS:
Throughout the
travels we encountered very high levels of anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism. I
have never encountered such intensity of emotion. The Muslim world in the years
of the Cold War, when the United States was so obviously the moral power,
admired and respected the United States. Today, we found that many Muslims do
not see the US as the moral power it once used to be; in fact, many of the
people we surveyed throughout the nine countries said that they would prefer
Saddam Hussein, the most ruthless and vile of dictators, to the Americans in
Iraq. In Turkey, the most popular film ever made called “Valley of the Wolves:
Iraq” was in theatres when we were there. It is crudely anti-American and it
shows a group of “Rambo” Turkish soldiers fighting against the “evil” United
States soldiers. Even in the moderate country of Indonesia, the number one role
model for young Indonesians is Osama bin Laden – who is now widely called
“Sheikh” as a mark of religious respect. The Muslim world focuses on action
rather than rhetoric and right now they are seeing cold-blooded rapes in Iraq by
US soldiers, the encouragement of torture, and they feel they are not seeing the
ideals of the United States of democracy, human rights, and acceptance of
diversity that it once so proudly and clearly stood for. One affluent woman who
used to live in the US even told my team that she was “scared” to bring her
grandchildren to the United States now because of the way they treat Muslims.
That is the bad news.
Furthermore,
there is a widespread perception in the Muslim world that Islam is under attack
from the United States and the West. As we saw with the Danish cartoon
controversy and the desecration of the Qur’an, Muslims all over the world are
very passionate about their religion and their Prophet. It is a culture with
high reverence for and sensitivity to these religious symbols and traditions.
There is a
struggle within Islam which has been in play for centuries but is now erupting,
between the more literalist interpreters of Islam and the more receptive and
mystic forms. Right now, the warfare in Iraq and Afghanistan, perceived attacks
on Islam, and insensitivity to culture are all reinforcing the strong,
literalist, interpretations of Islam. More outward signs of orthodoxy are
spreading throughout the Muslim world, even to Indonesia. The greater the
perception that Islam is under attack, then, the greater the support for those
Muslims who stand up as champions of Islam. There is clearly cause and effect
here.
I am referring to
anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism but we need to keep in mind Islamophobia
which means a hatred of Islam and prejudice against Muslims. Although they are
different to each other, I suggest we need to understand their impact on each
other. Islamophobia after 9/11 has gained momentum. The reason is obvious: the
19 hijackers on 9/11 were all Muslim. Some of the most wanted people in the
world like Osama bin Laden are Muslim. People too readily equated all Muslims to
terrorists and extremists. The result of this Islamophobia has been attacks on
Islam and on Muslims. Muslims find that there is little hope of getting justice
in this climate and are sometimes pushed towards acts of violence. I do not wish
to condone these acts by any means and have condemned them, but I want to put
the discussion in some context.
GOOD NEWS:
But there is good
news. This ignorance and hatred can be challenged and can change. Just as
Muslims are sensitive to “attacks” on Islam, Muslims are also very receptive to
the positive messages from within Islam. I encourage all of the Senators and
American people to learn about Islam and find the common bonds between the two
civilizations.
Indeed, American
values of equality, justice, knowledge, and compassion (as seen in the respect
for human rights) are shared explicitly with Islam. Remind the leaders and the
people there of these common values without giving a lecture – remind them of
this especially in their own context as well. Beheadings and suicide bombings
are not part of Islam—remind them of that and that two of the greatest
attributes of God in Islam are the “merciful” and the “compassionate”. Speaking
about the common values shared by the Founding Fathers of the United States and
the ideals of Islam will make a powerful and long-lasting impact on the hearts
and minds of Muslims.
Furthermore,
Muslims, Christians and Jews share deep bonds between them. Muslims are asked in
the Qur’an to recognize the Jews and the Christians as “people of the book” and
they hold a special place in our theology. A common figure who inspires us and
who we share as a common patriarch and ancestor is Abraham. As for the love of
Jesus in Islam, I urge you to read the “Jesus Poems” of Rumi who is such a
popular poet in the United States. The notions of an omnipotent, universal God,
the Ten Commandments, many of the central values are shared by the religions.
Political and historical events have divided us, but examples of peaceful
coexistence between the three religions can also be seen in history and
contemporary society.
I also used this
idea to encourage understanding during my travels. The first and most important
steps were to encourage dialogue, understanding, and friendship. One of the ways
I would deal with the anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism was to talk of the
dialogues I am having and the friendships that have been created between Jews,
Christians, and Muslims and give my own personal example. I mentioned my friends
like Jean and Steve Case, Doug and Ann Holladay, Bishop John and Karen Chane,
Rabbi Bruce Lustig and his wife Amy, and Dr. Lachland Reed. In my travels and
talks I mentioned these wonderful Americans who became my friends and who
reached out to me after 9/11 seeing a lonely stranger in their midst.
I mentioned how I
am personally inspired by the example of my friend Judea Pearl who lost his only
son Danny Pearl in a brutal, savage and senseless killing in Karachi. Having got
to know him as a friend over the years, because of our dialogues conducted
nationally and internationally in promoting Jewish Muslim understanding, I have
seen the heroic transformation of a personal tragedy into building a bridge to
reach out and understand the very civilization that produced the killers who
took his son’s life. I would point out that these friendships have also helped
to transform the relationship between Muslims, Jews, and Christians in the
United States.
Please keep the
context in mind: I was quoting these names in a mosque in Damascus where I was
asked to deliver the post-sermon talk on a Friday, in madrassahs in Deoband and
Delhi, and in speeches in Islamabad as well as the Royal Institute in Amman.
I would finally
ask my team of young Americans to speak and I would introduce them as the best
ambassadors we have between the US and the Muslim world as intrepid Americans
who represented the best ideals of America (for commentary on our travels see
Beliefenet.com for articles by Dilshad Ali and the young Americans who
accompanied me, Hailey Woldt and Jonathan Hayden).
As a professor on
campus, I would recommend essential reading to Muslims during our travels and
now to you all to help us understand each other: the first book is by my friend
Dr. Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, and it is called The
Dignity of Difference. It is a powerful plea for Abrahmic understanding in the
age of globalization. The second book I would like to recommend is also by a
friend, Karen Armstrong, and her book is The Battle for God. In this book Karen
illustrates how the three different faiths Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, are
all going through a period of intense internal debate in which what she calls
the “fundamentalists” who are in opposition to the more “moderate” or “liberal”
versions of faith. The third is my own book Islam Under Siege which argues that
we are living in a world in which societies are all feeling under siege. When
societies are under siege they tend to be defensive and there is little scope
for wisdom and compassion.
Essentially, I
have one recommendation, one that can easily be dismissed as too idealistic, but
that is the only way to making a lasting peace for the US and the Muslim world:
it is to create friendships across religion, race and tradition. I have
discovered that once friendship develops then everything can change. Without
these friendships, dialogue itself remains a restricted exchange of ideas and
leads to little else. This suggestion may be unlikely, but without genuine
friendships forming we cannot expect any major changes in how we are dealing
with the political situations on the ground. Take the example of the
Palestinians and the Israelis. Too often the two view each other as enemies and
are not prepared to concede anything except in terms of an advantage to
themselves. The result is that even if there are concessions there are seen to
be a result of bitter negotiations which continue to leave acrimony on both
sides. But if both parties are able to create friendships and then meet as
friends the situation will be very different and the peace process itself may
take on a new momentum and a new meaning.
In conclusion,
this will not be easy, but the exercise to understand the Muslim world is not a
luxury for the United States: it is an imperative. It is the first step to
confronting the looming series of world crises, and as you on the panel are
those who this great nation looks to for wisdom and guidance, I plead with you
to set aside the partisan and parochial issues to focus on the challenges of
providing justice, compassion and friendship in this dangerous, uncertain, and
violent time. (Views expressed by Dr Akbar Ahmed at a Senate Foreign Relations
Committee hearing in Washington on July 18, 2006.)
Source:
http://www.pakistanlink.com/Opinion/2006/July06/28/01.HTM
|