|
||||||||||
|
The Search for a Rational and Coherent Worldview Pantheistic Monism and Naturalism
Activist and Writer – India
V.A. Mohamad Ashrof is an Indian professional columnist and author both in English and Malayalam. You can reach him at vamashrof@yahoo.com .
This series delves into the basics of various worldviews. It explores the philosophical problems inherent in them and paves the way to find an intellectually satisfying worldview. The articles aim at helping the reader have a critical and introspective evaluation of long-held beliefs, their implications, and meanings
Pantheistic Monism Pantheism holds that God is identical with the real world. Beyond him is only illusion or unreality. The basic postulates of the pantheistic monism are these: God is the one, infinite, impersonal, ultimate reality, which means that God is the cosmos. God is all that exists; nothing exists that is not God. Whatever appears to exist, other than God, is illusion (maya) and actually does not exist. The soul of the cosmos is the same soul of each and every human being. A pantheistic God is an impersonal force driven by metaphysical necessity and not by volitional and loving choice. God is in the entire world; the world is the body of God. God is to the world as the mind is to the body. Creation emerges out of God's being either by incarnation, emanation, or some kind of unfolding. In
fact a strict pantheist must affirm that God is the only reality, and he is
not which is self-contradictory, since one must surely exist in order to
acknowledge that he does not exist.
Claiming that man, as a self-conscious being is merely a mode of God, is a rejection of the way man experiences himself. If
we are being misled about the consciousness of our own being, how does a
pantheist know that he is not being hoodwinked when he is conscious of reality
as ultimately one?
Naturalism is a view of the world
that takes account only of natural elements and forces excluding the
supernatural or spiritual. The
cosmos exists as a uniformity of cause and effect in a closed system. Human
beings are complex physico-chemical machines. Naturalists argue that all traditional philosophy is worthless because it assumes a cosmic purpose and centers upon the human race.
A
naturalist believes that non-thinking matter created man with his power of
rational reflections. Consciousness and thought are products of the brain.
Matter is not a product of mind, but mind itself is only the highest product of
matter. In the naturalist's argument, the straightforward becomes too incredible, and the too incredible becomes the straightforward. The apparent becomes the absurd, and the absurd becomes the apparent. God is, by definition, the Supreme Being. Also by definition, nothing is greater than the Supreme. And a producer indeed possesses overall superior capabilities (a consequence of being more complex, than that which he produces. It follows from this that no person or thing could have created God. In order for someone or something to create God, Who is already the supreme being, he or it would have to be more supreme than the Supreme, and this of course is a logical impossibility. God is of the metaphysical, beyond or external to material nature. Certainly chance cannot cause anything; it is only a way of describing events. If one believes in chance as the alternative to God, then the whole universe is a vast series of the most amazing miracles because, out of a universal nothingness, a primeval atom suddenly developed. Then, as time went by, that atom developed into the entire vast universe we can see now, including the spark of life. This is a staggering concept which boggles the mind and boggles any sense of rationality. In
the worldview of naturalism, purposelessness pervades everything. The atheist
misses the inspiration and consolation of the divine message. The violation of
moral values is easy under strong temptation if these values are man-made.
Morality loses its basis, and pessimism (death being the end of life) prevails
ultimately.
Lewis, C.S.
Reflections on the Psalms.
Glasgow: Collins, 1977.
Source: http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1164545858638&pagename=Zone-English-Discover_Islam%2FDIELayout |
Please report any
broken links to
Webmaster
Copyright © 1988-2012 irfi.org. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer