Do Americans Have a Moral Conscience?
By Paul Craig Roberts
May 28, 2009 "Information Clearing House" --- Torture is a violation of US and international law. Yet, president George W. Bush and vice president Dick Cheney, on the basis of legally incompetent memos prepared by Justice Department officials, gave the OK to interrogators to violate US and international law.
The new Obama administration shows no inclination to uphold the rule of law by prosecuting those who abused their offices and broke the law.
Cheney claims, absurdly, that torture was necessary in order to save American cities from nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists. Many Americans have bought the argument that torture is morally justified in order to make terrorists reveal where ticking nuclear bombs are before they explode.
However, there were no hidden ticking nuclear bombs. Hypothetical scenarios were used to justify torture for other purposes.
We now know that the reason the Bush regime tortured its
captives was to coerce false testimony that linked
Torture, then, was a second Bush regime crime used to
produce an alibi for the illegal and unprovoked
U.S. Representative Ron Paul (R,Tx) understands the danger
to Americans of permitting government to violate the law. In "Torturing
the Rule of Law" http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22705.htm , he said that the
One might think that the American public's toleration of torture reflects the breakdown of the country's Christian faith. Alas, a recent poll released by the Pew Forum reveals that most white Christian evangelicals and white Catholics condone torture. In contrast, only a minority of those who seldom or never attend church services condone torture.
It is a known fact that torture produces unreliable information. The only purpose of torture is to produce false confessions. The fact that a majority of American Christians condone torture enabled the Bush regime's efforts to legalize torture.
George Hunsinger, professor at Princeton Theological Seminary, has stepped into the Christian void with a powerful book, Torture is a Moral Issue. A collection of essays by thoughtful and moral people, including an American admiral and general, the book demonstrates the danger of torture to the human soul, to civil liberty, and to the morale and safety of soldiers.
Condoning torture, Hunsinger writes, "marks a milestone in the disintegration of American democracy." In his contribution, Hunsinger destroys the constructed hypothetical scenarios used to create a moral case for torture. He points out that no such real world cases ever exist. Once torture is normalized, it is used despite the absence of the hypothetical scenario.
Hunsinger notes that "evidence" obtained by
torture can have catastrophic consequences. In making the case against
turned out to be nothing but the coerced false confession of
Al-Libi, who was relentlessly tortured in
Some Americans, unable to face the criminality and
inhumanity of their own government, maintain that the government hasn't
tortured anyone, because water boarding and other "enhanced interrogation
techniques" are not torture. This is really grasping at straws. As Ron
Paul points out, according to
If the Obama regime does not hold the Bush regime accountable for violating US and international law, then the Obama regime is complicit in the Bush regime's crimes. If the American people permit Obama to look the other way in order "to move on," the American people are also complicit in the crimes.
Hunsinger, Paul and others are trying to save our souls, our
humanity, our civil liberty and the rule of law. Obama can say that he forbids
torture, but if those responsible are not held accountable, he has no way of
enforcing his order. As perpetrators are discharged from the military and
re-enter society, some will find employment as police officers and prison
officials and guards, and the practice will spread. The dark side will take
Please report any
broken links to
Copyright © 1988-2012 irfi.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer