|
||||||||
|
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA) ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE
T.O. SHANAVAS. MD
(Author
of “Islamic
Theory of Evolution The Missing link Between Darwin and the Origin of
Species”
(Publisher: Brainbow press, USA). Co-authored the book,
And God
Said, "Let There Be Evolution!": Reconciling the Book of Genesis, the
Qur'an and the Theory of Evolution" edited by Prof.
Charlie Wynn and Prof. Arthur Wiggins. (Publisher: All Things That
Matter Press, USA.)
I have taken a mortgage for my home, not because I cannot afford pay in
front but it makes economic sense ( also “…but
do not waste: verily, He does not love the wasteful!” Quran 7:31)
even though it is claimed that
there is a consensus among most Muslim scholars against paying and
taking interest. We, the members of Islamic center of Greater Toledo,
took 3 million dollar bank loan for initial construction of the mosque
in 1981and 2.5 million dollars for later expansion.
Let me state explicitly:
Let there be
no doubt that the Quran categorically
prohibited
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA),
“O you who have believed, do not consume
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA),
doubled and multiplied, but fear Allah that you may be successful.”
(3:130).
“Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden
Riba
“
(2:275).
Then what is the rationale to
go against the Muslim consensus (ijma)?
It is based upon multiple observations of which 6 are listed below:
1.
Muslim
consensus gives a special status to cash/ currency as compare to all
other assets
2.
Ummar
Ibn-Kathab’s statement on
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA),
3.
Divergent
message from hadiths collections
4.
The definition of
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA) by
eminent early Muslim scholars
5.
The Quran
6.
History of Pre-
Abu Bakr al-Jassas
(d. 370 Hijrah)
Definition of Riba, the Riba
al-Jāhiliyyah.
Muslim consensus gives a special status to cash/ currency as compare to
all other assets.
A simplified definition of interest is
interest
is a
fee
paid by a borrower of
assets
to the owner as a form of compensation for the use of the assets.
Scholarly voices from Muslim countries without free press draw a
boundary line between cash and other assets.
It restricts the
rent of cash illegitimate or haraam and makes the rent of all
other assets legitimate or halaal. This artificial bifurcation,
cash being separated from other assets,
is completely baseless due to the following reasoning:
(A).
First of all, this unnatural division of
asset is not admitted throughout the
world
neither in
theory nor in practice. None of branches of knowledge directly related
to assets e.g. accounting, economics and commerce recognize it.
Even in ordinary life it is not so, same
treatment is given to cash and all other assets throughout the world in
theory as well as in practice. Hence this artificial bifurcation
does not exist in the real world.
(B). The definition of interest with artificial bifurcation
is self-contradictory. The
religious scholars, handpicked by Muslim countries, ruled properties
that depreciate can be rented. So, all assets
that are depreciated with the passage of time can be given on rent. But
this rule is not admitted in the case of cash / currency, even though
currency is also depreciated with the passage of time due to inflation.
Hence here also the bifurcation is a completely self- contradictory
concept.
(C).
The most important point is that, Quran is also not ready to
accept this baseless concept of artificial bifurcation. The simple proof
of this fact is that Quran has used the term mal
(مَالَ)
for all assets including
cash. Quran has used the word 86 times but it is never used exclusively
for cash anywhere in the Quran. Hence the
Quran does not support this strange concept of bifurcation.
According to the
so-called “Islamic financing,” renting an asset or apartment or other
commodity is halaal and
renting cash haraam. For
example, Renting of $
100,000 dollar for buying a home at the current 4% yearly interest rate
costs
$ 4000 interest even without expected
33% US tax decrease on it. Renting
$ 100,000 dollar apartment costs the renter about 500 dollar/month =
6000 dollar/year is halaal.
The renter owes more money to apartment owner
than to a bank and still apartment renting is
halaal and renting currency
is haraam. It does not make
sense.
Islam’s
position regarding justice is unequivocal and universal.
“O
ye who believe!
stand out firmly for justice,
as witnesses to Allah, even as against yourselves, or your parents, or
your kin, and
whether it be (against) rich or poor:
for Allah can best protect both. Follow not the lusts (of your hearts),
lest ye swerve, and if ye distort (justice) or decline to do justice,
verily Allah is well- acquainted with all that ye do.”
[Quran 4: 135].
Who is the most just and more honorable in this? The one who
rents an apartment for more money or a bank that rents the money for
less and at the same time force saving?
2.
UMAR
IBN KHATAB (RA): Riba related verse
was the last verse revealed and Prophet (S) did not explain it in
detail.
`Umar
delivered a sermon on the pulpit of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), saying,
"Alcoholic drinks were prohibited by Divine Order, and these drinks used
to be prepared from five things, i.e., grapes, dates, wheat, barley and
honey. Alcoholic drink is that, that disturbs the mind." `Umar
added, "I wish Allah's Apostle had not left us before he had given us
definite verdicts concerning three matters, i.e., how much a
grandfather may inherit (of his grandson), the inheritance of Al-Kalala
(the deceased person among whose heirs there is no father or son), and
various types of Riba (usury) ."
(REFERENCE:
Ibn Majah, Sunan Ibn Majah, tr. M. T. Ansari (New Delhi, 2000), Book of
Inheritance, Vol. 4, #2267).
Most Muslims believe the Quran or Prophet (s) did not explain
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)”.
Initially let me quote few Hadiths pertinent to our discussion.
The selective reading of the set of Hadiths 1-5 definitely endorses the
opinion held by most mosque communities.
But a parallel reading of Hadith 1-5 and the set of hadith A-E
leads to different or at least four kinds of “holy truths.”
Initially let me quote the Hadiths that Muslims use to endorse the point
of view that all
” Riba
are haraam.
Hadith # 1
Jabir said that Allah's Messenger (may peace be
upon him) cursed the accepter of the Riba and its payer,
and one who records it, and the two witnesses, and he said: They are all
equal. (Muslim: Book
#010,
Hadith
#3881)
Hadith # 2.
Narrated 'Aun bin Abu Juhaifa: My father bought a slave who practiced
the profession of cupping. (My father broke the slave's instruments of
cupping). I asked my father why he had done so. He replied, "The
Prophet forbade the acceptance of the price of a dog or blood,
and also forbade the profession of tattooing, getting tattooed and
receiving or giving
the Riba."
(Bukhari: Book
#34,
Hadith
#299).
Hadith # 3
From Anas ibn Malik: The Prophet said: “If a
man extends a loan to someone he should not accept a gift.” (Mishkat,
op. cit., on the authority of Bukhari's Tarikh and Ibn Taymiyyah’s
al-Muntaqa)
Hadith # 4.
Narrated Abu Burda: When I came to Medina. I met Abdullah bin Salam. He
said, "Will you come to me so that I may serve you with Sawiq (i.e.
powdered barley) and dates, and let you enter a (blessed) house that in
which the Prophet entered?" Then he added, "You are In a country where
the practice of Riba is prevalent; so if
somebody owe you something and he sends you a present of a load of
chopped straw or a load of barley or a load of provender
then do not take it, as it is Riba." (Bukhari:
Book
#58,
Hadith
#159)
Hadith # 5
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah's
Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Gold is to be paid for by
gold, silver by silver, wheat by wheat, barley by barley, dates by
dates, salt by salt, like by like, payment being made hand to hand.
He who made an addition to it, or asked for an
addition, in fact dealt in the Riba. The receiver and the giver
are equally guilty. (MUSLIM:
Book
#010,
Hadith
#3854)
Summary of the above hadiths:
1.
Any addition over the loaned capital is
haraam.
2.
The Creditor cannot accept or the debtor cannot offer even gift because
gift become the riba.
The following Hadiths challenges and contradict above hadiths and the
derived conclusions:
Hadith A
Hadith B
Abu Huraira (Allah be pleased with him) reported: There came a person
demanding a camel from Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him). He
(the Holy Prophet) said: Give him (the camel)
of that age or of more mature age, and said: Best among you is
one who is best in clearing off the debt. (MUSLIM:
Book
#010,
Hadith
#3900)
Hadith C
“Malik related to me from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that Mujahid said, "Abdullah
ibn Umar borrowed some dirhams from a man, then he discharged his debt
with dirhams better than them. The man said, 'Abu Abdar-Rahman. These
are better than the dirhams which I lent you.' Abdullah ibn Umar said,
'I know that. But I am happy with myself about that.'…"
Malik’s
Muwatta: Book
#31, Hadith
#31.42.91
Hadith D
Narrated Abu Rafi':
“The Messenger of Allah (s borrowed a young
camel, and when the camels of the sadaqah (alms) came to him,
he ordered me to pay the man his young camel.
I said: I find only an excellent camel in its
seventh year. So the Prophet (s) said: Give it to him, for the best
person is he who discharges his debt in the best manner.” (Jami
Al- Tirmidhi,
Kitab al-Buyu, v.6, #56]
Hadith E
Narrated Al-A'mash: We argued at Ibrahim's dwelling place about
mortgaging in Salam. He said, "Aisha said, 'The Prophet bought some
foodstuff from a Jew on credit and the payment was to be made by a
definite period, and he mortgaged
his iron armor to him." (Bukhari: Book
#35,
Hadith
#454)
Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet died while his armor was
mortgaged
to a Jew for thirty Sa's of barley. (Bukhari:
Book
#59,
Hadith
#743)
This type of mortgaging or using pawnbroker’s service is recognized as
Islamically valid and acceptable, as illustrated through this hadith.
Summary of Hadith A-D:
1. Contrary to the set of
Hadiths 1-5 quoted above, the set of Hadith A-D shows the Prophet (s)
and Ummar (ra) giving extra amount over and above than they borrowed. By
the definition of the people and scholars for so-called Islamic
financing, the extra “giving”
of Prophet (s) and Ummr (ra) in this instance becomes
” الرِّبَا ”
(THE
RIBA).
2.
There is every reason that the Jew extended loan with without taking
profit or interest for the loan to Prophet (s) because Jewish Scripture
freely allow the creditor Jew to charge interest:
Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother, usury of money,
usury of Victuals, usury
of anything that is lent upon usury. Unto a stranger thou Mayest
lend upon usury….”
(Deuteronomy 23: 19-20).
Prophet (s) was well-known among his people for honesty before his
prophethood, and used to be called "al-ameen"
(the trustworthy). This is a name that would not be given except to one
who was extremely truthful, trustworthy and upright. In spite of it the
Jew took Prophet (s) had to mortgage his armor to Jew to borrow food
suggesting that the Jew did not trust Prophet (s). And therefore it is
illogical to assume that such a Jew
offered food to Prophet (s) on credit and did not benefit from the
transaction, and if he did, then isn't that riba?
After reading these two sets of Hadiths (1-5 and A-E) following can be
stated:
1.
This sets
of hadiths (1-5 and A-E) on “The Riba” are contradictory and is
problematic and so there are no supporting crystal clear evidence for
the “haraamization” of every
kind of interest (riba) in
financing business.
2.
Set 1-5
are authentic and A-D are not and so all interest in in finance are
Haraam.
3.
Set A-E
are authentic and set 1-5 are not and so interest (riba), not loan
sharking “
al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا ”
is
Halaal,
4.
Set A-E
is before the prohibition and set 1-5 after the prohibition of the Riba
by God and so the riba is prohibited.
5.
There is
no definitive information or corroboration to support Hadith A-E are
from a time before the revelation of “
al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا. ”
Moreover,
there is no reason to believe
that the Jew extended the loan to Prophet (s) without riba because
Jewish Scripture freely allow him to charge interest and his arbor
remained mortgaged until after his death. It contradict # 4 statement.
Moreover, The Riba verses were revealed after conquest of Mecca and
according to Ummar (ra) Prophet (s) died before explaining “
al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا. ”
The two sets of hadiths (1-5 and A-E) is quite clear. “
al---Riba (” الرِّبَا ”
in Quran cannot be synonymous
with the extra paid by Prophet (s) and Ummar (ra). From these
Hadith sets we conclude extra payment over and above borrowed amount
(interest) is permissible and at the same time “
al---Riba (” الرِّبَا ” is
prohibited. Such an understanding of the two sets of Hadiths (1-5-and
A-E) preserve the authenticity of “Sahih
Hadiths” of Bukhari and Muslim and protects it becoming
da’if (week).
The Quran and “
al---Riba (” الرِّبَا .”
The commonly held Muslim censuses is that the Qur’an does not define
“ al---Riba (” الرِّبَا .”
This judgment contradicts
the Quran. The Quran states that
the God spelled out the “easy
to understand
Quran
(54:17)
as the “guide
for the pious”
(2:2)
to lead “to
the path which is clearer and straighter than any other”
(54:17)
by
“clarifying every matter.”
(16:89).
Therefore,
there is no better source than the Quran “to
clarify every matter” and
“easy to understand.”
God’s speech is never redundant or arbitrary. If anyone claims
redundancy in letter and word in the Quran it undermines the divine
authority of the book. So, I
believe it is impossible to take away or ignore a single word or to even
remove single particle from the text without seriously damaging the
integrity of its meaning.
Likewise, every attempt to restructure the syntax of the text, for
example by ignoring or moving a word forward or backward would
significantly alter the meaning substantially. Every letter, word, and
its location in the Divine Speech are precise
and purposeful. All have a specific function and meaning. So, let us
look at the phrase “al—URiba (”
الرِّبَا
”).
In order to understand “ al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا ” in the Quran,
we initially need to define the word, riba.
According to Lisan Al Arab, a classical Arabic dictionary, the
grammatical declination of the noun riba is derived from the verse “raba”
which means “increased or grew.” Therefore, any increase in borrowed
capital can be defined as riba.
If we do not make clear distinction between generic “riba” and “al—URiba
(”
الرِّبَا
”),
then an act of making profit out of buying and selling in trade becomes
prohibited activity. But any sort of increase or raise or riba is not
”
الرِّبَا
”
( THE RIBA) prohibited by shariah.
Thus all the verses of the Quran regarding the prohibition of the riba
mentions it as “al—URiba (”
الرِّبَا
”),
that is with the definite article “al.”
The certainly the definite article, “al”,
here is not indefinite or general, otherwise every form of
monetary increase, such as business profit would have been prohibited.
So, “al” here is a specific and some
special kind of increase has been prohibited under
shariah.
In order to demarcate “al—URiba (”
الرِّبَا
”)
from the generic “riba,” the
Quran assigned two properties to
“al—URiba (”
الرِّبَا
”).
They are: 1. Extortion of people’s wealth by “doubling
and multiplied claims” (Quran 3:130); and 2. “consuming
people's property unjustly”
in verse (4:161). “Consuming
Unjustly”, because a Muslim expected to be kind and compassionate to a
fellow being in trouble.
So based on these Quranic criteria, not every kind of riba or increase
or interest on capital is al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا
”).
al---Riba
(” الرِّبَا
”)
is the doubling or multiplying of the obligation of the debtor if he/she
makes default at the end of the term of the loan. According to Imam
Al-Razi quoted below, the creditor collect interest every month and then
ask to return the capital in full and if not given, creditor increase
the obligation of the debtor. Such an understanding of “al---Riba
(” الرِّبَا
”
was recorded by Tabari and others in the classical Islamic period. For
example:
(A).
Explaining the meaning of the term used in verse 3:130 (O
you who have believed, do not consume“
al---Riba (” الرِّبَا ” ,
doubled and multiplied, but fear Allah that you may be successful.”),
Tabari (d.310 AH), the well known commentator on the Qur’an, says:
“Do not consume riba after having professed Islam as you have
been consuming it
before Islam. The way pre-Islamic Arabs used to consume riba was
that one of them would have
a debt repayable on a specific date. When that date came the creditor
would
demand repayment from the debtor. The latter would say, ‘Defer
the repayment of my debt; I
will add to your wealth.’ This is the Riba
which was doubled and redoubled.”
(REFERENCE:
Tabari: Jami’ al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Quran Vol. IV page 59. quoted in A.
Saeed, Islamic Banking and Interest: A Study of the Prohibition of Riba
and its Contemporary Interpretation (New York, 1996), p.22
(B)
The way in which riba was doubled and redoubled in the
pre-Islamic period is expressed by the son of Zayd b. Aslam (d.136 AH)
as follows:
The Riba in the pre-Islamic period
consisted of the doubling and redoubling [of money
or commodities],
and in the age [of the cattle]. At maturity, the creditor would say
to the debtor, ‘Will
you pay me, or increase [the debt]?’ If the debtor had anything, he
would pay. Otherwise, the age of the cattle [to be repaid] would
be
increased . . . If the
debt was money or a commodity, the debt would be doubled to be
paid in one year,
and even then, if the debtor could not pay, it would be doubled
again; one hundred in one
year would become two hundred. If that was not paid, the debt
would increase to four
hundred. Each year the debt would be
doubled.
(REFERENCE:
bn Hajar Tahdhib
al-taTahdhib. Vol.3. Page 395 quoted in A. Saeed, P. 22)
(C)
Imam
Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (d. 606) in his Tafsir al-kabir
had describes very clearly the customary practice of lending and
borrowing. He stated that Pre-Islamic Arabs used to charge interest on
borrowed money and at end of the term of loan if the creditor cannot pay
the creditor increased the capital owed by the debtor. This increase is
“The Riba.”
"As for the riba al-nasi`ah, it was a
transaction well-known and recognized in the days of
Jahiliyyah, i.e., they would advance money on the basis that they
will take a specified
amount every month and the principal will remain due. Then on the
date the debt became
due, they demanded the debtor to pay the principal. If payment
became impossible (or
hard), they would increase the term and the payable amount. So
this was the riba people
practiced in the time of Jahiliyyah."
REFRERENCE:
http://www.islamicperspectives.com/Riba2.htm
(D).
This type of riba (“al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا
”
) is known as Riba al-jāhiliyyah, and
according to some Islamic scholars, such as Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d.
241/855), only such Riba is undoubtedly unlawful from the Islamic
viewpoint. Ibn Qayyim al Jawziyya (d.
AH 691) describes the views of Ibn Hambal as follows:
“The Qur’an vehemently condemns
riba, but provides little explanation of what
that term means, beyond contrasting riba and charity and
mentioning exorbitant
‘doubling’.
Commentators describe a pre-Islamic practice of extending delay to
debtors in return for an increase in the principal (riba
al-jāhiliyyah). Since this
practice is recorded as existing at the time of the revelation,
it is one certain
instance of what the Qur’an prohibits.
Hence Ibn Hanbal, founder of the Hanbali
School, declared that this practice—‘pay or increase’—is the only
form of riba the
prohibition of which is beyond any doubt.”
[REFERENCE;
Ibn Qayyim al Jawziyya quoted in F. Vogel and S. Hayes, Islamic Law and
Finance: Religion, Risk and Return (The Hague, 1998), 72-73. Hereinafter
F. Vogel and S. Hayes.)
(E).
Imam Malik (d. 179 AH) in his Muwatta uses the same definition.
“Malik related to me that Zayd ibn Aslam said, ‘Riba in the
Jahiliyya was that
a man would give a loan to a man for a set term.
When the term was due, he
would say, “Will you pay it off or increase me?”
If the man paid, he took it. If
not, he increased him in his debt and lengthened the term for
him”.
(REFERENCE:
Imam Malik, Muwatta, #1361)
(F).
al-Baghawi (d. 510 Hijrah ) repeats the same understanding in his
Qur’anic commentary on verse 277 of al-Baqarah as he narrates a
tradition from Ikrimah (d. 107 AH) and Ata (d. 117 AH), which offers the
same definition in the sense of which Riba was used:
“Regarding the word of God: ‘O believers! Fear God and forgo what
remains of al-
riba’,ʿAta
and ʿIkrimah
said that this verse revealed in connection with [the dealings] of
al-ʿAbbas
ibn ʿAbd
al-Muttalib and Uthman bin ʿAffan,
may Allah be pleased with them.
These persons used to make advance deals about dates in advance
before the
ripening of the crop [i.e., they used to buy dates in advance
with cash or with dates].
After the ripening
of dates the owner would say that if you two exercise your right,
nothing would be left for the sustenance of my family;
would you agree to
take only
half of the agreed quantity and leave the remaining half which I
will pay in double quantity
next season. So they agreed to this. When the appointed time
came, they demanded the
increase. When the Prophet heard about it, he prohibited it and
the said verse was
revealed.”
(REFERENCE:
Tafsir al-Baghawi quoted in I. Suhail, What is Riba? (New Delhi, 1999),
p. 97. Sited by Mohammad Omar Farooq “Exploitation, Profit and the
Riba-Interest Reductionism.” International Journal of Islamic and Middle
Eastern Finance and Management. Vol. 5 Iss: 4 (Date online 23/10/2012)
(G)
Abdullah Saeed, Professor of Arabic and Islamic studies,
University of Melbourne, Australia further refers to Zamakhshari (d. 549
AH)12 and Baydawi (d. 691 AH) in the same way.
He also mentions Ibn al-Arabi (d. 543 AH) in the same vein. Riba
was well known among the Arabs. A person would sell something on a
deferred payment basis. Upon maturity the creditor would say [to the
debtor]:
‘Riba was well known among the Arabs. A person would sell
something on a deferred
payment basis. Upon maturity the creditor would say [to the
debtor]: ‘Will you pay [as
agreed]
or will you add an amount to the [original] debt?’
(REFERENCE:
Ibn al-Arabi quoted in A. Saeed, 23.)
Therefore, Riba prohibited is the Pre-Islamic practice al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا
”)
or the Riba al-jāhiliyyah of doubling and tripling of the obligation of
the debtor.
The injustice and exploitation involved in such riba-based transactions
are obvious, and hardly require any further explanation or
rationalization.
Summary:
The meaning of al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا
”)
is “extortionate claim over the property of the debtor by the creditor.”
That is why the Quran characterizes such extortion as “their
consuming people's property unjustly”
in verse (4:161).
Let us study the verses on al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا
”)
in the Quran
based on what I have explained above.
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA) verses
Let us study the verses on al---Riba (”
الرِّبَا
”)
in the Quran
based on what I have explained above.
“Their taking
الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA
which was prohibited for them, and their consuming people's property
unjustly. For the unbelievers among them, We have prepared a painful
torment.”
(4:161)
The verse was a reference to Jews who charge
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)
against Jewish Scriptural directive on their Jewish brothers:
“…Take thou not usury of him, or increase: but fear of God;
that thou brother may live with thee….”
(Leviticus 25:35-7)
The Quran 3:130
“O you who have believed, do not consume
الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA,
doubled and multiplied, but fear Allah
that you may be successful.
Pre-Islamic Arabians practiced a kind of futures market, not exactly as
practiced today.
Current futures market
is a central financial exchange where people can trade standardized
futures contracts, that is, a contract to buy specific quantities of a
commodity or financial instrument at a specified price with delivery set
at a specified time in the future. Similarly, Arabs
traders including prominent companions of Prophet (s) advance grain or
fruits or other commodities to the farmers the long before harvest was
due along with an oral agreement to give back the traders certain amount
of grain or fruits after his harvest at a specified time. If the farmer
could not deliver his promise either due to crop failure or other
reasons the trader doubled or even more the amount grains or fruit to be
delivered for the extension delivery date. The increase depended solely
on the whims of the trader. This extortionate increase (“doubled
and multiplied,”) of the commodity to be delivered is
الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA).
The prophet (s) prohibited such futures contract. For example, with
unripe dates:
“Ibn 'Umar (Allah be pleased with them) reported that Allah's Messenger
(may peace be upon him) forbade the sale of palm-trees
(i. e. their frults) until the dates
began to ripen, and ears of corn until they were white and were safe
from blight. He forbade the seller and the buyer. (Muslim:
Book
#010,
Hadith
#3666)
If we closely look at the Hadith # 5 quoted above along with another
hadith, what I said becomes very clear.
“…Prophet had said, 'There is no riba when it is not done from
hand to hand (i.e. when there is delay in payment).' "
(Book
#34,
Hadith
#386)
Bukhari. Riba happens only on delayed payment.
Now
read the Hadith #5.
“Prophet said;
Gold is to be paid for by gold, silver by silver, wheat by wheat, barley
by barley, dates by dates, salt by salt, like by like, payment being
made hand to hand.
He who made an addition to it, or asked for an addition, in fact dealt
in the Riba. The receiver and the giver are equally guilty.”
We need to ask, who in the world did or does exchange an ounce of wheat,
barley, dates, gold salt etc., of exact quantity and of same quality?
What would be the rationale for exchanging a pound of barley with
another pound or kilo of the same quality? If the orthodox position or
understanding is considered valid, here it seems that the Prophet has
permitted a kind of transaction that people have no reason to engage in.
Usually, permission of Prophet (s) involves something that people
usually do or need. In this case, none of those possibilities apply.
People without any sense will exchange an equal
amount of the same quality of wheat in trade. How in the world
the Prophet would permit something that people cannot be expected to
sensibly engage in real life? This is clearly a
trivialization of the Prophet's guidance. On the other hand, it will
make lots of sense only if Prophet (s) is talking about Pre-Islamic form
futures market and the extortionate increase of capital obligation of
debtors, ”
الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA),
when the farmer is unable to deliver wheat that he borrowed.
Quran 275-280 2:275-276.
Those who live on ”
الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA).
will not rise up before Allah
except like those who are driven to madness by the touch of Shaitan.
That is because they claim: "Trading is no different than
”
الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA),
but Allah has made trading lawful and
”
الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)
unlawful.
He who has received the admonition from his Rabb and has mended his way
may keep his previous gains; Allah will
be his judge. Those who turn back (repeat this crime), they shall be the
inmates of hellfire wherein they will live for ever.
Allah has laid His
curse on
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA) and blessed charity to prosper. Allah does not love any
ungrateful sinner.
Comment:
Verse 2:275 restates affirmatively the prohibition of
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA).
God characterizes
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)
here as a curse.
God let the creditor keep
“previous gains” as a mercy. 2:278-280.
O ye who believe! Observe your duty to Allah, and
give up what remaineth (due to you) from usury,
if ye are (in truth) believers. If you will not give up
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA), which you demand, know that you are in the state of war
with God and His Messenger. But if you repent,
you will have your capital. Do not commit injustice and no justice will
be done to you.”
If the debtor is in a difficulty, grant him time till it is easy for him
to repay. But if ye remit it by way of charity, that is best for you if
ye only knew.” Finally, God states in verse 282:
“O
you who believe! when you deal with each other in contracting a debt for
a fixed time, then write it down;…” because the unjust practice of
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)
based only oral agreement and the “doubling
and multiplying”
of
the obligation from the debtor by the whims of the creditor without a
written contract.
Comments:
1. All remaining part of
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)
after this last revelation annulled.
2.
“if you will not
“give up what remaineth (due to you)
from
”
الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA),”
you are in the state of war with God and His Messenger.
3. Creditor can collect the capital If the debtor is financially
solvent.
4. If the debtor is in a difficulty, grant him time till it is
easy for him to repay.
5. the debtor cannot pay, God recommends to forgive the debt
charitably because
“…Allah
causes charitable deeds to prosper.” Quran 2:276).
6. All debt
contracts must be written down and witnessed.
SUMMARY
1. Most Muslims believe that the
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)
verses were the last verses revealed.
2. Prophet (s) did not live long enough explain
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)
3. Most Muslims believe Hadith set 1-5 prohibit
” الرِّبَا
”
in
general.
4. The Set of Hadith set A-D
allows paying extra with return of borrowed
money or commodity.
5. There are instances when
Propher (s) and Ummar (a) paid more than they
borrowed.
So,
” الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)
and interest are one and the same.
6. All the verses of the Quran regarding the prohibition of the riba
mentions it as “al—URiba
(”
الرِّبَا
”),
that is with the definite article “al.”
The certainly the definite article, “al”,
here is not indefinite or general,. So,
the “al” here is a specific and some
special kind of increase has been prohibited under
shariah.
7. ”
الرِّبَا
”
(THE
RIBA)
is an extortionist practice in Arabian futures
market in Prophet (s)’ time and nothing remotely similar to current
banking practices.
8. Prophet (s)
prohibited futures market existed in his
time.
9.
Muslims must write a contract agreement
in presence of witness any future promises. 10. All debt contracts must be written and witnessed. |
Please report any
broken links to
Webmaster
Copyright © 1988-2012 irfi.org. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer